World’s First Green Bank – 3 Billion Sterling to Lend to Sustainable Projects

 

green-investment-bank-logo

 

 

 

A new banking consciousness has begun!

As Britain heads towards it’s goal to drastically cut its carbon emissions by 2020, thw world’s first green bank will
use at least 80 percent of its capital to fund the Government’s Green Deal.

According to their website — and fabulously snubbing Canada:

In order to meet this green challenge there are ambitious and legally binding targets which the UK must meet.  These are set out in the Kyoto Protocol, the 2008 Climate Change Act and the Energy Bill of 2012.  Building green infrastructure and financing the projects to support this will be fundamental in meeting the targets including:

  • a reduction in green-house gas emissions of 34% by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050;
  • 15% of all energy consumed generated from green sources by 2020; and
  • ‘reduction in waste’ to landfill.

 

Visit The Banks Website!

 

 

Cool New Sponges Can Recycle CO2 Into Fuel

Courtesy by: Care 2. Beth Buczynski

UnknownWhen your ice tea overflows the cup, forming a puddle on the counter, how do you clean it up? A sponge of course. Now scientists are working to see if the same idea will work with all that excess carbon dioxide that’s swirling around in our atmosphere.

Researchers at Australia’s national science agency, CSIRO, are developing a smart material called a MOF (metal organic framework) that could make it possible to capture C02 without using further coal-based energy. Using only the power of sunlight, these ‘solar sponges’ could be a new way to recycle carbon emissions without creating more in the process.

Traditionally, carbon dioxide capture has been accomplished through the use of liquid absorbers to catch flue gases at a coal-fired power plant before they escape into the atmosphere. The gases must then be heated to release the CO2 which is then stored and can be re-used. While slightly better than letting pollutants fly free, this process can consume as a much as 30 percent of a power plant’s production capacity. Not exactly efficient, especially when talking about power from fossil fuels.

In comparison, the CSIRO team uses a process called dynamic photo-switching, which refers to the reversible light-induced switching of floor or intensity. Instead of using liquid absorbers, the team used MOFs to absorb as much as a liter of nitrogen gas in just one gram of material. The unique material only requires UV light to trigger the release of CO2 after it has been captured from the mixture of exhaust gases. When exposed to concentrated UV light the MOF sponge instantaneously releases up to 64 percent of absorbed CO2, which can then be recycled into usable fuel.

“The capture and release process can be compared to soaking up water with a sponge and then wringing it out. When UV light hits the material its structure bends and twists and stored gas is released,” said Dr Matthew Hill, who was awarded a 2012 Eureka Prize for his MOF research and led the CSIRO group conducting this research. ”This is an exciting development for carbon capture because concentrated solar energy can be used instead of further coal-based energy to driv

Science Matters: Uruguay’s “poor” president is a unique leader

By David Suzuki

When bright young idealists share their environmental concerns with me, I encourage them to get involved in politics. That’s where decisions have to be made about the severe ecological problems we face.

3954570014_ea2a64f073
Have you noticed, though, how often idealism gives way to a sense of entitlement to all the perks that come with political office? It’s amazing how being elected to serve the people is often turned on its head: we’re expected to support elected leaders without protest or question. And what happens to many who leave government? Lucrative board memberships and business deals.

Some politicians take a different road, though. Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter stepped down after one term, was roundly ridiculed by popular media, yet continued to dedicate his life to promoting justice and eliminating poverty around the world. Nelson Mandela is another incredible role model who sets a high bar.

But something particularly unique is happening in South America. I only recently learned of Jose Mujica, a remarkable man who became president of Uruguay in 2009.

He’s a radical activist who, in the 1960s, joined the left-wing guerrilla group known as Tupamaros, formed by sugar-cane workers and students. The organization was crushed after a military coup in 1973. Mujica was shot six times and imprisoned for 14 years; he claims incarceration solidified his thinking. In 1985, constitutional democracy was restored to Uruguay and Mujica was released. He ran for office and was elected president in 2009.

And what a politician! He’s a vegetarian who lives in his wife’s ramshackle farmhouse where they work together in the fields growing flowers. He turned down the opportunity to move into the presidential palace in Montevideo, preferring to stay on the farm, which is linked to the capital city by a dirt road. Under Uruguay’s law, elected officials must declare their personal wealth. In 2010, Mujica’s was $1,800, the value of the 1987 Volkswagen beetle he drives. When he added a share of his wife’s assets – her house, land and tractor – it brought his declared family wealth to $215,000.

Mujica receives $12,000 a month as president but donates 90 per cent of it to the poor and small businesses. “I can live well with what I have,” he says. “I’m called ‘the poorest president’, but I don’t feel poor. Poor people are those who only work to try to keep an expensive lifestyle, and always want more and more.”

He added, “This is a matter of freedom. If you don’t have many possessions then you don’t need to work all your life like a slave to sustain them, and therefore you have more time for yourself. I may appear to be an eccentric old man… But this is a free choice.”

Mujica attended Rio+20, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, in June 2012, where he stated: “We’ve been talking all afternoon about sustainable development – to get the masses out of poverty. But what are we thinking? Do we want the model of development and consumption of the rich countries? I ask you now: What would happen to this planet if Indians would have the same proportion of cars per household as Germans? How much oxygen would we have left? Does this planet have enough resources so seven or eight billion can have the same level of consumption and waste that today is seen in rich societies? It is this level of hyper-consumption that is harming our planet.”

Mujica says most world leaders have a “blind obsession to achieve growth with consumption, as if the contrary would mean the end of the world.”

He’s hit a bit of a bump in popularity, dropping below 50 per cent for refusing to veto a bill legalizing abortion before 12 weeks (as all his predecessors did) and supporting a debate on legalization of marijuana use that would give the state a monopoly over its trade. Mujica points out: “Consumption of cannabis is not the most worrying thing; drug-dealing is the real problem.”

Mujica isn’t worried about the drop in popularity. It’s part of politics, and besides, he’s 77 and can’t run again in 2014. He’s a good role model with wise, enduring values, and an inspiration for people around the world.

For more insights from David Suzuki, please read Everything Under the Sun (Greystone Books/David Suzuki Foundation), by David Suzuki and Ian Hanington, now available in bookstores and online

Wind Beats Out Natural Gas To Become Top Source Of New Electricity Capacity For 2012 | ThinkProgress

By Jeff Spross on Jan 22, 2013 at 4:30 pm Thinkprogress.org

Through June of 2012, renewable energywas right behind natural gas in terms of the most new energy generating capacity being installed in the United States, with wind making up most of the renewables push. And now Business Insider has flagged the numbers for the remainder of the year.

Last week, they reported that wind ultimately pulled ahead of natural gas to become the leading installer of new capacity in 2012, at 10,689 total megawatts.

Those numbers came from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s report on the trends and highlights in U.S. energy for the past year. According to FERC’s update, natural gas installed 8,746 megawatts of new capacity, coal installed 4,510 new megawatts, and solar came in fourth with 1,476 new megawatts. Here’s the relevant table from the report, conveniently highlighted by Business Insider:

One thing to note here is the issue of capacity factor: That’s how much power an installation actually produces as a percentage of its theoretical capacity. (Which is what’s listed in the table.) Natural gas plants do quite well in this regard: Their median performance tends to come out to at least 80 percent, and they max out at 93 percent, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s cost database.

Unfortunately, wind power doesn’t perform as well, due to the intermittency of, well, wind. Its median tends to be around 40 percent offshore. Onshore it’s been at 30 percent, though arguably onshore performance is pulling alongside offshore. And both max out at 50 to 54 percent. So even though wind beat out natural gas for new capacity in 2012, the new natural gas installation will almost certainly wind up generating more total electricity.

The good news for wind is that it’s still a relatively young technology, with lots of room to improve. The energy it does deliver is produced much more efficiently in comparison to natural gas — the former loses less than one percent of its energy as waste heat, while the latter can lose as much as 54 percent. Natural gas production in the U.S. may be on track to plateau, leading to predictions of rising prices, which will give wind power a further economic opening.

And, of course, there’s the fact that, while cleaner than coal, natural gas remains a contributor to greenhouse gas emissions both through leaks and combustion.

UPDATE

As it turns out, this post’s math was unjustly critical of wind energy. The numbers for capacity are theoretical, but as as an email commenter pointed out, the numbers for capacity utilization are theoretical as well.

So how have wind and natural gas actually performed? Well, in 2010, nameplate capacity for natural gas was 467.2 gigawatts, and 39.5 gigawatts for wind. That same year, natural gas generated 987,700 gigawatthours and wind generated 94,700 gigawatthours. Multiply the capacities by the 8760 hours in a year, and what you get is natural gas produced 24.1 percent of its nameplate capacity in 2010, and wind produced 27.4 percent.

Now, a lot of “peaker” power plants — ones intended to only operate during hours of peak electricity demand — are gas-fired. Around half the natural gas plants in the country probably fall into this camp, which will dramatically skew natural gas’ capacity utilization to the low end. So factor in peakers and natural gas still probably beats out wind, but by less than our piece implied.

The Great RSPO Membership Myth: Why Buying from RSPO Members Is Meaningless

Courtesy Rainforest Action Network

Written by Ashley Schaeffer

“Companies buying palm oil need to be aware that the only way to ensure sustainable sourcing is to buy certified sustainable palm oil from companies that have been assessed against the RSPO standards. Buying from RSPO members is not enough.” – WWF, August 2010

 
Girl Guide Thin Mints Contain Rainforest Destroying-Palm Oil

Scouts USA (GSUSA) has actively resisted getting rainforest-destroying palm oil out of their cookies for years now. Instead, they tout the fact that their two cookie bakers are members of the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).

But Girl Scouts USA and anyone else touting RSPO membership as a green seal of approval — or anyone who even claims that RSPO membership makes a company’s products “orangutan friendly” — are gravely misleading the public with false claims.

Girl Scouts of America sold roughly 198 million boxes of Girl Scout cookies in 2009. One of the two cookie manufacturers, Little Brownie Bakers, bakes over 4,500,000 Thin Mints per day during peak baking times. And guess what’s going into every single one of those cookies? Palm oil, a controversial commodity closely connected to widespread deforestation and social conflicts in Indonesia.

RSPO Members Have Been Documented Destroying Orangutan Habitat

For a cookie business raking in $714 million a year with a presence in all 50 states and 2.7 million young sales women, one would think that Girl Scouts USA would make sure that the ingredients they’re using are in line with the Girl Scout values and mission to make the world a better place and use resources wisely.

The RSPO is a body of stakeholders including palm oil producers, processors, traders, retailers, banks and NGOs working to promote the growth, production, distribution and use of sustainable palm oil. There is a very important distinction between RSPO membership and RSPO certification. RSPO certification is a seal of approval that is given to palm oil grown on a plantation that has been certified through a verification of the production process by accredited certifying agencies. In theory, the “certified sustainable” palm oil (RSPO oil) is traceable through the supply chain by certification of each facility along the supply chain that processes or uses the certified oil.

RSPO membership, on the other hand, is much different. As we recently advised Girl Scouts USA CEO Kathy Cloninger in a letter of concern about the palm oil in Girl Scout cookies:

Although Girl Scout cookie bakers have RSPO membership, RSPO membership does not provide any assurance that palm oil supplied by member companies is sustainable. Member companies have been documented clearing forest, peatland and critical wildlife habitat while ignoring human rights — all of which are prohibited in the RSPO principles and criteria. In essence RSPO membership does not ensure that deforestation, orangutan extinction, and climate change are not found in Girl Scout cookies.

According to an independent audit commissioned by Unilever, RSPO member Sinar Mas has contributed to the opening up of deep peatland, deforestation of orangutan habitat, and occurrences of fire hot spots.

Mongabay reports, “The [RSPO] has been battered over the past year with revelations that some members have continued to destroy ecologically sensitive habitats. Prominent members, including Unilever and Nestle, have had to act outside the RSPO process to address misconduct by RSPO-member suppliers.”

Sinar Mas is not the only RSPO member that has been caught red-handed. There are many cases that illustrate the fact that RSPO members regularly violate the principles and criteria they have agreed to respect with their membership. Take the example of RSPO Member IOI Group. While it has some RSPO-certified plantations, the same company has others that are the source of major social conflict.

Conservation scientists report critical habitat protection weaknesses in the RSPO system. William Laurance of James Cook University and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute argues that the initiative’s objectives are undermined by the composition of its membership, which is dominated by palm oil industry growers, processors, and traders. He says:

[T]his conflict of interest results in lax requirements for membership, a cumbersome complaints process for reporting violations, and lack of oversight and enforcement. It needs to get tougher with member companies that are destroying large swaths of primary forest. Otherwise, it risks becoming an apologist for an environmentally destructive industry.

Until RSPO membership means more than simply paying a few thousand dollars a year in membership fees, any company or organization that claims any product made by an RSPO member is orangutan or forest friendly is grossly misleading the public. Orangutans and forests will only be truly protected in Sumatra and Borneo once expansion of palm oil in fragile tropical forests ceases and a moratorium on deforestation for palm oil is both adopted and implemented.

My Comments To The Enbridge Panel January 8, 2013

(Please Note: the italics are what I wrote but chose to omit as the bell had already struck and though I wanted to I didn’t actually wear this outfit. Woulda been fun though!)

 
Hello Sheila, Hans and Kenneth thank you for listening with open hearts and minds. I don’t suppose any of this process is a picnic for you so I am appealing to your highest consciousness. Speaking to you from one human being to another: from one organism that needs clean water, air and un-poisoned land with which to thrive to, another.

 

My name is Nomi Lyonns. And as you won’t be surprised, I’m here speaking out against the Enbridge Pipeline. You’ve already heard from much wiser and more informed persons than I such as our First Nations community, scientists and others on the subjects of the health, cultural, environmental and economic impacts. From their authoritative perspective, it doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to deduce that this project does not make any forward thinking sense. If it weren’t so sad, I’d laugh at the irony of us madly digging up the dinosaurs when the whole oil industry is a dinosaur in itself.

Hopefully, listening to all the wise words over this last year has had some effect to sober your thoughts enough to rethink and turn down this ill-devised and intensely arcane Northern Gateway Project.

 

I fear however, that as many have suggested before me, that it’s already a done deal according to Stephen Harper’s assertion of just that to the Chinese government. On the off chance that this board will indeed act on the bigger picture and deliver a deafening NO to Mr. Harper in your final report, I humbly offer my personal perspective.

 

Now according to Joe Oliver I am a dangerous radical, tree-hugging, anti-business, socialist, commie, hippie, pinko, wing nut or whatever other disparaging and distracting slur that may come to a bully’s mind.

 

In my view, I’m a small business owner — I am yoga teacher and natural health consultant holding healing retreats on Salt Spring Island. I rely heavily on tourism and a healthy environment to have a successful business. I grew up on Salt Spring and also spent a time in Prince Rupert. Living along the west coast my whole life I have traveled the waters both on ferries and on the cruise ships where I worked for a number of years. I’ve traversed the seas from the tip of Vancouver Island clear up to Alaska. I’m well acquainted with the storms and severe weather we have in this region that as recently as last month cancelled numerous ferry sailings. And, I can tell you first hand these are not the calm and predictable seas Enbridge’s misleading “mean average” maths would have you believe. There were many, many evenings that I spent in prayer that our 70 tonne ship would survive the 60 foot waves regularly slamming into us.

 

I’m also an editor for handful of a online news sites: one a stock market analysis site another a news wire service in Vancouver and another an environmental review website. The latter has been the result of an ever exasperated feeling that the powers that be are not doing enough to deal with climate change – something that all the insurance companies around the globe seem to believe in – not to mention the climate change denying scientists such as Richard Mueller.

 

Like many, I’ve been acutely aware of climate change for years: I’ve witnessed the dramatic drop in species numbers in the wetlands near where I live, I’ve noticed the change in weather patterns and I’ve listened to the unbiased scientists who have nothing to gain by acknowledging our global situation. All the while I’ve wondered, when will the scales tip? When will the powers that be open their eyes, give their children and grandchildren a fighting chance – and act in a rational manner. The cynic in me feels that true to humanity’s foolishness in these things, we’ll wait till it’s too late.

 

Part of me feels this is a waste of my valuable time however, the yogi in me has to be hopeful that our goodness will prevail over our greed, stupidity and arrogance.

 

In our short sightedness, we’ve created this ugly entity called the Tar Sands where we must lie to others and ourselves to convince us that the few temporary jobs created are good for Canada. If so why are we bringing in foreign workers who will work for less than what the current workers are willing. I know some of these workers personally and we’ve discussed the elephant in the room. They themselves have confirmed first hand knowledge of pollution, leakage and coverups.

 

One story highlights the dishonesty inherent in the Tar Sand business practices whereby my friend, after reporting a tailing pond leakage spilling into a waterway, was inexplicably and immediately transferred to another project area. Meanwhile, another friend told of her astonishment when she witnessed a work glove she’d accidentally dropped into one of these tailing ponds dissolve before her eyes. She said, “Now, I know what happened to all those birds”.

 

More astonishing to me was that, knowing all this my friends could still work at such a literal and figurative toxic place. My friend’s comment was that she wanted her slice of the pie and if it wasn’t her someone else would do it. Guess she was right about that. Like everyone else, it was the money that lured her – despite her knowledge of the health risks to herself – not to mention all the people living in the area and downstream. She felt that since she was a heavy smoker and self-admitted alcoholic she was going to die young any way.

 

The fact that Enbridge is off the hook when there is the inevitable oil spill, the fact that they have consistently lied to the public by covering up their past spills, used misleading advertisements that rewrites maps and misinforms the public concerns me immensely and it should be a huge red flag to anyone who is sincere in their assessment as to the integrity of any company.

 

When will we stop lying to ourselves that we even need this project in this day and age in Canada. Denmark is going to be 100% green energy by 2015, Germany is well on its way and even India and China are putting more money into green infrastructure than we are. Just the other day, Joe Oliver suggested that the US is only 20-30 years away from being oil independent. So what are we doing?

 

I’m assuming it’s this board’s job to to be responsible. To tell the Truth. The Truth is, from the bigger picture perspective, we, and everything else, are all connected. The breath I just breathed is in you now and vice versa. We know this intellectually. I’m not telling you anything you don’t know but we are not behaving in our own best interest if we keep ignoring the science based facts that have been systematically stripped away from the public eye.

 

We are living in a remarkable age where the consciousness of the planet is changing, where there are no more secrets, where we must work together in a sustainable way in order for our own survival. Don’t let us get left behind like the dinosaurs. We’re smart Canadians, we can once again be leaders on the world stage if we clean up our act. If we can undo the damage that has been done by Stephen Harper’s regime.

 

I invite you to step up and be a real hero; be the accountable leaders you can be: have the courage to do the right thing. To have compassion for your fellow humans as well as the animals and ecosystems that we are all part of. We don’t own the earth, we are part of it. We are made up of minerals and water and carbon, we are what we eat and we eat and drink what this earth provides. We can’t take it with us but the insanity of greed somehow makes us forget this fact.

 

Now please don’t get me wrong, I do not want to be a hypocrite — I do drive a truck after all but I must walk my talk. I’m not perfect by any stretch of the imagination however, mostly I walk, take the bus, ride my bike, hitch hike and car pool or use skype for as many meetings as possible. My personal best is to have a tank of gas last me 3 months because I do believe it is all our responsibility to create the change we want to see in the world. I know we won’t get off oil over night so we must ween ourselves off now.

 

In closing I would just ask that you consider what you want your epitaph or the history books to say about you – about your role in this historical time. That you were brave, responsible, forward-thinkers who truly cared about your legacy and families or that you helped put the nail in all our coffins.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

There IS a Bicycle Economy, Two Cities Find

Courtesy by: A.K. Streeter. Treehugger

Portland, Oregon and New York City, two very different cities, are finding something similar about cyclists and pedestrians – they tend to spend a bit more money in local economies.

Transportation Alternatives has been promoting the ‘bicycle economy’ in New York’s East Village, finding that:

“Streets that promote bicycling and walking mean more business for local shops and restaurants,” said Paul Steely White, Executive Director of Transportation Alternatives (TA). “When it comes to the impact bike lanes have on local businesses, it’s a case of ‘if you build it, they will come.”

In the East Village, putting in new bikes lanes has lead to an increase in cycling, with nearly a quarter of residents reporting biking for their transportation needs. Altogether, 95% of retail dollars in the area that Transportation Alternatives studied were spent by cyclists, pedestrians, and public transport users.

That’s perhaps not a completely surprising find, as in the dense East Village, most people are cyclists, pedestrians, and public transport users, rather than car drivers. Yet it is important to counteract that ingrained perception that car-based business is ‘better’. Transportation Alternatives found that of the four different mobility groups, cyclists and peds spent the most (when looking at weekly spending).

People on bike and foot spent the most per capita per week, $163 and $158, respectively, at

local businesses. Car and subway users spend less per capita, $143 and $111, respectively, according to TA.

In Portland, Oregon, a less dense city, researcher Kelly Clifton found a slightly different yet also persuasive case that over time, pedestrians and cyclists spend more than their car-driving brethren.

Clifton and her team collected surveys at 89 spots in Portland, finding out how much money people spent, how often they visited, and how far they traveled to get there. The majority of people, it should be said, still arrived at the different locations by car.

And looking at single visits, car drivers spent more at supermarkets and restaurants than the other transport modes. Yet it turns out that walkers, bikers, and public transport takers visit the locations more frequently, and thus, over the space of a month, spent more.

At convenience and supermarkets, walkers spent more. At bars and restaurants, bikers and transit users were neck and neck on spending, in both cases ahead of car drivers.

This is good news for planners trying to keep local business vibrant.

As Clifton puts it in the report on the research:

“Cyclists are greater spenders on average…Patrons who arrive by automobile do not necessarily convey greater monetary benefits to businesses than bicyclists, transit users, or pedestrians. This finding is contrary to what business owners often believe.” - Business Cycles, Catering to the Bicycling Market

7 Ways to Have More by Owning Less

Courtesy by: Maria Popova. http://www.brainpickings.org

 

Stuff. We all accumulate it and eventually form all kinds of emotional attachments to it. (Arguably, because the marketing machine of the 20th century has conditioned us to do so.) But digital platforms and cloud-based tools are making it increasingly easy to have all the things we want without actually owning them. Because, as Wired founder and notable futurist Kevin Kelly once put it, “access is better than ownership.” Here are seven services that help shrink your carbon footprint, lighten your economic load and generally liberate you from the shackles of stuff through the power of sharing.

NEIGHBORGOODS

The age of keeping up with the Jonses is over. The time of linking up with them has begin. NeighborGoods is a new platform that allows you to do just that, allowing you to borrow and lend from and to your neighbors rather than buying new stuff. (Remind us please, what happened to that fancy blender you bought and used only twice?) From lawnmowers to bikes to DVD’s, the LA-based startup dubs itself “the Craigslist for borrowing,” allowing you to both save and earn money.

Transparent user ratings, transaction histories and privacy controls make the sharing process simple and safe, while automated calendars and reminders ensure the safe return of loaned items.

Give NeighborGoods a shot by creating a sharing group for your apartment building, campus, office, or reading group — both your wallet and your social life will thank you.

UPDATE: Per the co-founder’s kind comment below, we should clarify that NeighborGoods also allows you to import your Twitter and Facebook friends from the get-go, so you have an instant group to share with.

SNAPGOODS

Similarly to Neighborgoods,SnapGoods allows you to rent, borrow and lend within your community. SnapGoods takes things step further by expanding the notion of “community” not only to your local group — neighborhood, office or apartment building — but to your social graph across the web’s trusted corners. The site features full Facebook and Meetup integration, extending your social circle to the cloud.

 

You can browse the goods people in your area are lending or take a look at what they need and lend a hand (or a sewing machine, as may be the case) if you’ve got the goods.

LANDSHARE

Growing one’s own produce is every hipster-urbanite’s pipe dream. But the trouble with it is that you have to actually have a place to grow it. And while a pot of cherry tomatoes in your fire escape is better than nothing, it’s hardly anything. Enter Landshare, an innovative platform for connecting aspiring growers with landowners who have the space but don’t use it.

Though currently only available in the U.K., we do hope to see Landshare itself, or at least the concept behind it, spread worldwide soon.

SWAPTREE

swaptree is a simple yet brilliant platform for swapping your media possessions — from books to DVD’s to vinyl — once they’ve run their course in your life as you hunt for the next great thing. Since we first covered swaptree nearly three years ago, the site has facilitated some 1.6 million swaps, saving its users an estimated $10.3 million while reducing their collective carbon footprint by 9.3 million tons.

Inspired by the founders’ moms, whose lunch dates with girlfriends turned into book-swap clubs, swaptree makes sure that the only thing between you and the latest season of 24 is the price of postage.

GIFTFLOW

Most of us are familiar with the concept of regifting. (No disrespect, but the disconnect between good friends and good taste is sometimes astounding.) Luckily, GiftFlow allows you to swap gifts you don’t want for ones other people don’t want but you do. The platform is based on a system of karmic reputation, where your profile shows all you’ve given and taken, building an implicit system of trust through transparency.

 

So go ahead, grandma. Hit us with your latest sweet but misguided gift. Chances are, there’s someone out there who’d kill for that kitschy music box.

ZIPCAR

We’re big proponents of bikesharing but, to this point, the concept has failed to transcend local implementations. While some cities like Paris, Amsterdam and Denver are fortunate enough to have thriving bikesharing programs, we’re yet to see a single service available across different locations. Until then, we’d have to settle for the next best sharing-based transportation solution: Zipcar, a 24/7, on-demand carsharing service that gives its members flexible access to thousands of cars across the U.S., U.K. and Canada. Zipcar has been around for quite some time and most people are already familiar with it, so we won’t overelaborate, but suffice it to say the service is the most promising solution to reducing both traffic congestion and pollution in cities without reducing the actual number of drivers.

SHARE SOME SUGAR

Lend me some sugar, I am your neighbor. More than an Outkast lyric line, this is the inspiration behind share some sugar — a celebration of neighborliness through the sharing of goods and resources. Much like SnapGoods and NeighborGoods, the service lets you borrow, rent and share stuff within your neighborhood or group of friends

 

 

The Urban Weaver Project

The Vancouver Parks and Recreation Board is pleased to announce a new environmental art project in MacLean Park Fieldhouse presented in partnership with the Stanley Park Ecology Society, The Urban Weaver supports artists from diverse traditions working with ecologists exploring the creative repurposing of green waste.

The Urban Weaver:

Todd Devries  (Haida), Sharon Kallis (Welsh) and Debra Sparrow (Musqueam) are local artist-weavers collaborating with the Stanley Park Ecology Society and the Vancouver Park Board in an exploration of how invasive plants in the city can be used as urban substitutes for traditional weaving materials. English ivy, Himalayan blackberry, and yellow flag iris hold great potential as contemporary alternatives,  replacing materials such as cedar bark and cattails that cannot be sustainably harvested in urban centres. The artists will be working out of the MacLean Park Fieldhouse, near the Strathcona Community Centre, and there will be open studio times and free community workshops scheduled for next spring and summer. Community members can also get involved in harvesting and preparation of the invasive materials for personal creative use. This exciting project is just getting started so please stop by MacLean Park and meet the artists.

This project aligns with Park Board’s Strategic Priorities regarding ‘Greening’, ‘Engaging People’ and ‘Resource Management’ and responds to recent motions in support of the creative management and repurposing of both green waste and surplus spaces.

http://theurbanweaverproject.wordpress.com

 

Imagine a GREEN world!

Imagine That Graphics is a progressive company, and is meeting it’s own mandate for greener business practices. We are making good choices for the environment and are carbon neutral. We believe in sustainable business for the planet’s future. We are doing our part to be the change we wish to see in the world through active involvement in our local and global community.